AISK develops 2D drawings and technical information for feasibility, planning, coordination, technical submissions and construction delivery.
As a project moves towards construction, information needs to explain build ups, dimensions, junctions, interfaces, material transitions and specialist requirements clearly enough to reduce interpretation on site.
AISK accepts technical design responsibility where it falls within the agreed scope and competence. Specialist engineering design remains with appropriately competent specialists, and proprietary manufacturer system design remains with the relevant manufacturer or system designer.
Existing buildings rarely match a perfect standard detail. AISK develops and reviews property specific information where openings, roof lines, retained elements, services or changes in insulation continuity require more considered technical detailing.
Drawings can also support manufacturer review, warranty or certification submissions, client assurance and remedial proposals.
Where a drawing exposes a thermal or moisture question that cannot be answered visually, the detail can be connected directly to AISK's Building Physics capability. This is particularly useful at constrained retrofit junctions where the general wall specification does not represent the local condition.
AISK's current CAD service is focused on 2D drawing and technical design, including planning, construction detailing, retrofit and technical submission support.
Where structural input is required, specialist structural engineering can be coordinated as part of the wider project.
Full case studies sit within Experience. These short examples show how the capability has been applied in practice.
A contractor's legacy EWI drawing library was reviewed and rebuilt around current project and system requirements. The work included technical coordination of junctions, controlled revisions and information intended for manufacturer and warranty review.
Where a junction could not be justified from a drawing alone, two dimensional thermal modelling and a property specific Construction Detail Note were used together so the design team received an auditable technical decision tool rather than a numerical result in isolation.
Audit findings were developed into clearer remedial routes, including investigation requirements, physical remediation options, alternative technical solutions and supporting details where the original defect description was not sufficient to price or construct.
